CMS has proposed extending site-neutral payment to certain imaging-without-contrast services furnished in excepted off-campus provider-based departments. Under the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (CMS-1850-P), released with a CMS fact sheet in July 2026, those departments would be paid 40% of the OPPS rate for the affected imaging lines, a roughly 60% payment reduction. Comments are open through August 31, 2026.
Until now, "excepted" (grandfathered) off-campus hospital outpatient departments kept full OPPS payment. This proposal breaks that shield for a defined slice of imaging, and pairs the cut with new enrollment requirements for off-campus HOPDs. If your health system bills non-contrast imaging through grandfathered off-campus sites, the affected lines lose roughly 60 cents of every payment dollar.
What changed
The grandfather clause just got narrower
Since Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 took effect, off-campus provider-based departments have lived in two worlds. Excepted departments, those billing under OPPS before the statutory cutoff, kept the full hospital outpatient rate and append modifier PO. Non-excepted departments bill with modifier PN and already receive a reduced, site-neutral rate. CMS previously applied a site-neutral policy to clinic visits at excepted sites; CMS-1850-P now proposes doing the same for certain imaging-without-contrast services, at 40% of the OPPS rate.
The matrix below shows exactly who is touched and who is not.
Comparison matrix
Imaging without contrast: payment by site of service under CMS-1850-P
Not touched by this imaging proposal
Plus new off-campus HOPD enrollment requirements
No new cut from this proposal
The proposal targets imaging without contrast
The math on one dollar
What 40% of OPPS means on an affected line
Two details matter for modeling. First, the cut is service-scoped, not site-scoped: an excepted department keeps full OPPS on everything outside the affected imaging-without-contrast set, so the revenue exposure is exactly the volume you bill on those lines with modifier PO. Second, this is a proposed rule. The 40% figure, the scope of affected imaging services, and the enrollment requirements can all move between now and the final rule, which is precisely why the comment window matters.
Timeline
Dates that govern your response
The second policy inside the rule
New enrollment requirements for off-campus HOPDs
The payment cut is getting the headlines, but CMS-1850-P also proposes new enrollment requirements for off-campus hospital outpatient departments. For health systems that have added, relocated, or expanded off-campus sites over the years, this is a data-integrity problem before it is a payment problem: CMS will be looking at how each off-campus location is enrolled, and departments whose provider-based status, addresses, or practice locations are stale in enrollment records create avoidable risk. An enrollment file that does not match how you actually bill PO and PN today is the wrong place to be standing when a site-specific payment policy arrives.
Operator playbook
Six moves before the comment window closes
- Pull PO/PN modifier volumes by site. This is the first operational step. Extract 12 months of hospital outpatient claims, split by modifier PO versus PN and by department location, so you know exactly which imaging volume sits in excepted off-campus sites.
- Isolate imaging-without-contrast lines. Within the PO population, flag the non-contrast imaging services. That subset times the roughly 60% reduction is your gross exposure under the proposal as written.
- Model CY 2027 revenue at 40% of OPPS. Re-price the affected lines at 40% of the current OPPS rate and roll the delta up by site, service line, and payer, since Medicare Advantage plans that shadow OPPS methodologies may follow.
- Audit off-campus enrollment records now. Reconcile every off-campus department's enrollment data, addresses, and provider-based attestations against how claims actually go out the door, ahead of the proposed enrollment requirements.
- File a comment by August 31, 2026. CMS reads specificity. Site-level volume, access, and margin data on affected imaging services is far more persuasive than a form letter, and the window closes August 31, 2026.
- Scenario-plan site strategy. If the policy finalizes, test whether affected imaging volume is better served in current locations at the reduced rate, consolidated on campus, or restructured, with compliance counsel in the room before any move.
- CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, CMS-1850-P, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
- CMS fact sheet on the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, July 2026; comment period through August 31, 2026
Know your exposure before CMS finalizes it
ASP-RCM Solutions builds exactly this analysis for hospital and health system clients: PO/PN modifier volume extraction, line-level re-pricing of imaging-without-contrast services at the proposed 40% rate, off-campus enrollment reconciliation, and comment-ready impact data, all from your own claims. If site-neutral expansion reaches your grandfathered sites, you should see the number before Medicare does.
Model your CY 2027 imaging exposureRelated reading
Where MPPR should reduce your second imaging service, and where it absolutely should not.
How a radiology group audited its same-session imaging claims against the CMS Multiple Procedure Payment Reduc
Read →WhitepaperMPPR in 2026: How Multiple-Imaging Reductions Reshape Radiology Revenue
A 2026 operator checklist for applying MPPR technical- and professional-component reductions to contiguous-bod
Read →InsightThe 2027 prior-auth API deadline is really a 2026 AR problem.
The CMS-0057-F Prior Authorization API goes live January 1, 2027, but the 72-hour and 7-day decision clocks ar
Read →