CMS has proposed extending site-neutral payment to certain imaging-without-contrast services furnished in excepted off-campus provider-based departments. Under the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (CMS-1850-P), released with a CMS fact sheet in July 2026, those departments would be paid 40% of the OPPS rate for the affected imaging lines, a roughly 60% payment reduction. Comments are open through August 31, 2026.

Until now, "excepted" (grandfathered) off-campus hospital outpatient departments kept full OPPS payment. This proposal breaks that shield for a defined slice of imaging, and pairs the cut with new enrollment requirements for off-campus HOPDs. If your health system bills non-contrast imaging through grandfathered off-campus sites, the affected lines lose roughly 60 cents of every payment dollar.

40%of the OPPS rate, proposed payment for imaging without contrast at excepted off-campus PBDs
~60%payment reduction on affected imaging lines at grandfathered sites
Aug 31, 2026comment period closes on CMS-1850-P

What changed

The grandfather clause just got narrower

Since Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 took effect, off-campus provider-based departments have lived in two worlds. Excepted departments, those billing under OPPS before the statutory cutoff, kept the full hospital outpatient rate and append modifier PO. Non-excepted departments bill with modifier PN and already receive a reduced, site-neutral rate. CMS previously applied a site-neutral policy to clinic visits at excepted sites; CMS-1850-P now proposes doing the same for certain imaging-without-contrast services, at 40% of the OPPS rate.

The matrix below shows exactly who is touched and who is not.

Comparison matrix

Imaging without contrast: payment by site of service under CMS-1850-P

Site of service
Payment today
CY 2027 proposed
Net effect
On-campus HOPDNo PO/PN modifier required
Full OPPS rate
Full OPPS rate
UNCHANGED
Not touched by this imaging proposal
Excepted off-campus PBDModifier PO, grandfathered
Full OPPS rate
40% of the OPPS rate for certain imaging-without-contrast services
~60% CUT
Plus new off-campus HOPD enrollment requirements
Non-excepted off-campus PBDModifier PN
Already paid at the reduced site-neutral rate
Continues at the site-neutral rate
ALREADY REDUCED
No new cut from this proposal
Imaging WITH contrast, all HOPD sitesOutside the proposal's scope
Current OPPS treatment
Not included in this site-neutral expansion
OUT OF SCOPE
The proposal targets imaging without contrast

The math on one dollar

What 40% of OPPS means on an affected line

Every $100 of current OPPS payment on an affected imaging-without-contrast line becomes $40. That is the roughly 60% reduction, applied line by line, not to the whole department.

Two details matter for modeling. First, the cut is service-scoped, not site-scoped: an excepted department keeps full OPPS on everything outside the affected imaging-without-contrast set, so the revenue exposure is exactly the volume you bill on those lines with modifier PO. Second, this is a proposed rule. The 40% figure, the scope of affected imaging services, and the enrollment requirements can all move between now and the final rule, which is precisely why the comment window matters.

Timeline

Dates that govern your response

JULY 2026CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (CMS-1850-P) issued; CMS fact sheet published
AUG 31, 2026Comment period closes. Last day to put impact data in front of CMS
CY 2027Policy takes effect for the CY 2027 payment year if finalized

The second policy inside the rule

New enrollment requirements for off-campus HOPDs

The payment cut is getting the headlines, but CMS-1850-P also proposes new enrollment requirements for off-campus hospital outpatient departments. For health systems that have added, relocated, or expanded off-campus sites over the years, this is a data-integrity problem before it is a payment problem: CMS will be looking at how each off-campus location is enrolled, and departments whose provider-based status, addresses, or practice locations are stale in enrollment records create avoidable risk. An enrollment file that does not match how you actually bill PO and PN today is the wrong place to be standing when a site-specific payment policy arrives.

Operator playbook

Six moves before the comment window closes

  1. Pull PO/PN modifier volumes by site. This is the first operational step. Extract 12 months of hospital outpatient claims, split by modifier PO versus PN and by department location, so you know exactly which imaging volume sits in excepted off-campus sites.
  2. Isolate imaging-without-contrast lines. Within the PO population, flag the non-contrast imaging services. That subset times the roughly 60% reduction is your gross exposure under the proposal as written.
  3. Model CY 2027 revenue at 40% of OPPS. Re-price the affected lines at 40% of the current OPPS rate and roll the delta up by site, service line, and payer, since Medicare Advantage plans that shadow OPPS methodologies may follow.
  4. Audit off-campus enrollment records now. Reconcile every off-campus department's enrollment data, addresses, and provider-based attestations against how claims actually go out the door, ahead of the proposed enrollment requirements.
  5. File a comment by August 31, 2026. CMS reads specificity. Site-level volume, access, and margin data on affected imaging services is far more persuasive than a form letter, and the window closes August 31, 2026.
  6. Scenario-plan site strategy. If the policy finalizes, test whether affected imaging volume is better served in current locations at the reduced rate, consolidated on campus, or restructured, with compliance counsel in the room before any move.
Sources
  • CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, CMS-1850-P, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  • CMS fact sheet on the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, July 2026; comment period through August 31, 2026

Know your exposure before CMS finalizes it

ASP-RCM Solutions builds exactly this analysis for hospital and health system clients: PO/PN modifier volume extraction, line-level re-pricing of imaging-without-contrast services at the proposed 40% rate, off-campus enrollment reconciliation, and comment-ready impact data, all from your own claims. If site-neutral expansion reaches your grandfathered sites, you should see the number before Medicare does.

Model your CY 2027 imaging exposure