Home/Specialties/Physician Groups
SPEC·04 · Physician Groups

E/M, modifiers, HCC. Provider-level discipline, not generic queues.

Multi-specialty groups, IPAs, MSOs, and ACOs. We staff specialty-aware coders, run provider-level CDI feedback, and reconcile payer rosters quarterly so revenue doesn’t get stuck behind a credentialing gap.

Coverage
28 medical
specialties
Dedicated coding benches.
Specialty-aligned coders, not a generic pool. The same coder learns the edge cases instead of guessing them.
What we run

Six functions tuned for physician revenue.

Physician billing rewards modifier discipline, E/M defensibility, and provider-level CDI. Below is what we run, and where physician groups usually leak.

01

E/M leveling & defensibility

2021/2023 E/M guidelines applied with provider-by-provider trending. Under-leveling and over-leveling both flagged. Documentation gaps fed back to the provider, not buried in a query queue.

2021/2023 E/MProvider-level trendAudit-ready
  • Method: time-based and MDM-based leveling, both audited monthly per provider.
  • Coaching: provider-level coaching cards, not generic policy memos.
  • Audit posture: documentation defends the level billed. we don’t bill what we can’t support.
02

Surgical bundling & modifier discipline

Modifier 22, 51, 59, 78, 79, 24, 25, 57, 58 nuance handled by surgical-bench coders, not generalists. NCCI-edit posture maintained. Global-period management is a workflow, not a guess.

Modifier disciplineNCCI editsGlobal-period workflow
  • Bench: surgical coders trained on multi-specialty surgery (gen, ortho, neuro, cardiac, plastics).
  • Modifier 25 / 57 discipline: defended with documentation, not stamped on for revenue.
  • Global-period tracking: pre-op, intra-op, post-op visits routed correctly. Re-ops modified appropriately.
03

HCC capture & risk-adjustment

For ACO, MA, and ACA-risk contracts. MEAT-supported documentation, provider-level RAF trending, and v24/v28 model awareness. We tell you which providers under-document. and coach them.

HCC v24 / v28MEAT-supportedProvider RAF trend
  • Capture rigor: every HCC has an explicit MEAT-style note reference, audit-defensible.
  • Trending: RAF score by provider per month, with year-over-year comparisons.
  • Closure: gap lists routed to providers ahead of visits, not after.
04

Payer roster reconciliation

Provider enrollment dies quietly. We run a quarterly truth-up against payer directories, payer rosters, and CAQH. Effective dates verified, retro-billing windows captured, gaps escalated before claims hit the floor.

Quarterly truth-upEffective-date captureCAQH attestation
  • Cadence: quarterly reconciliation against every contracted payer, not annually.
  • Retro-billing: effective-date confirmation prevents 60-90 days of preventable claim holds.
  • License monitoring: state, DEA, and board license expiration tracked, with 90-day advance alerts.
05

Denial management with provider feedback

Denials are taxonomized to root cause. The top-5 causes feed monthly upstream fixes. in physician practices, that’s usually documentation. Providers see specific examples, not generic queries.

Root-cause taxonomyProvider feedback loopTop-5 prevention
  • Touch SLA: every denial worked within 5 business days.
  • Provider feedback: examples routed to the originating physician, not pooled in a generic memo.
  • Prevention focus: the goal is fewer denials, not faster appeals.
06

AR follow-up & underpayment recovery

Dollar-weighted aging. Payer-specific cadence. Underpayment audits against fee schedules surface variances quarterly. the dollars most groups don’t know they’re missing.

Dollar-weightedPayer cadenceUnderpayment audit
  • Aging discipline: >90-day AR ratio cut to a contracted ceiling. Reviewed monthly.
  • Underpayment audit: quarterly variance against contracted allowable, with recovery pursued.
  • Patient-side coordination: handoff to PFS lane is clean, not a black hole.
Specialty depth on this bench

Where physician groups usually win or lose.

SPECIALTY
Primary care & internal med

Annual wellness, TCM, CCM, AWV. HCC capture in the routine visit, not just the annual.

SPECIALTY
Surgery & surgical sub

Modifier discipline, global periods, ASC vs office vs HOPD splits. Multi-surgeon billing.

SPECIALTY
Cardiology

Cath lab bundling, EP procedures, modifier 51/59, device monitoring follow-up.

SPECIALTY
Orthopedics

Global period management, hardware coding, DME splits, workers’ comp workflows.

SPECIALTY
OB/GYN

Global OB packaging, antepartum-only, delivery types, fetal monitoring rules.

SPECIALTY
Multi-specialty & IPA / ACO

Risk-adjustment governance across many TINs. Provider-level RAF and quality-gate management.

Engagement format

Five phases. Same partner.

DAY 1-15
Provider audit

10 charts per provider on a stratified sample. Baseline E/M, modifier, and HCC posture locked.

DAY 16-30
Roster truth-up

Every provider validated against every payer. Effective dates, CAQH, license status. all confirmed.

DAY 31-60
Cutover

Specialty benches assigned. Edit library loaded. Parallel run on the first cycle.

DAY 61-90
Provider feedback

First round of provider-level coaching cards. CFO scorecard line by line.

QUARTERLY
QBR + audit

External coding audit. Senior partner walks the scorecard with practice leadership.

What we put in writing

Six SLAs. Physician-specific.

METRICTARGETWHY IT MATTERS
Clean-claim rate95%+Professional clean-claim rate, by payer. Tracked daily, reported monthly.
Days in AR (dollar-weighted)32-38Physician-typical range. Specialty mix adjusted.
Denial rate< 5%By payer + root cause. Provider-level when documentation is the cause.
Coding accuracy95%+Random monthly sample, externally audited quarterly.
RAF capture (where applicable)+0.05 to 0.15Documentation-attributable RAF lift, year over year, per provider.
Net collection rate96-98%Cash collected vs. allowable, against payer-contract terms. CFO-audited annually.
THE STRUCTURAL CHOICE

The bench is organized by specialty, not by your TIN.

Most physician-billing vendors stand up a generic team per client. We organize coders by specialty: a surgical bench, a cardiology bench, an OB bench, an HCC bench. The same coder sees enough specialty volume to learn the edge cases. and that’s where the revenue is.

WHAT THAT MEANS IN PRACTICE

Provider-level depth, not pool-level breadth.

  • Specialty-aware coding. modifier discipline, global periods, HCC documentation rigor.
  • Provider-level coaching cards. specific examples, not generic policy memos.
  • RAF trending per provider. you see who under-documents, you can coach them.
  • Quarterly roster truth-up. revenue doesn’t sit behind a credentialing gap.
  • Underpayment audit. quarterly variance against contract; dollars recovered.
Physician scorecard

Four monthly outcomes.

Days in AR
Dollar-weighted
Specialty-adjusted
Denial rate
By payer + root cause
Provider feedback loop
RAF lift
Year over year
Where applicable
Net collection rate
Vs. contracted allowable
CFO-audited annually

Get a free 25-chart audit.

Send us 25 recent charts. mix of E/M, surgical, and (if applicable) HCC visits. We’ll send back a written accuracy and revenue-leak read. No obligation.