Who Gets Billing Credit When a Physician and an APP Share the Visit
Here is the short version. The setting decides the rulebook. In a facility, a shared encounter is a split/shared visit and the substantive portion picks the biller. In your office, the same pairing is governed by incident-to, and the credit follows a completely different set of conditions. Get the place of service wrong and you have picked the wrong rule before anyone even opens the note.
Two settings, two rulebooks, stacked one layer at a time
Read each stack top to bottom. Same physician, same APP, same patient, same group. The only thing that changed is the place of service, and every layer below it changes with it.
Facility
POS 21 · 22 · 19 · 23Office / Non-Facility
POS 11"Substantive portion" is a fork, not a stopwatch
For CY2026, CMS keeps the definition it set in the CY2024 Physician Fee Schedule final rule. In a split/shared visit you satisfy the substantive portion by either path. You choose the one that reflects what actually happened, and you document it.
More than half the total time
Add the physician's and the APP's face-to-face and non-face-to-face time for the day. Whoever crossed the midpoint bills the visit.
physician 58% · APP 42% → physician billsA substantive part of the MDM
Whoever performed the substantive part of the medical decision making bills, independent of the clock. Tie the elements of MDM to the provider who owned them.
MDM ownership → that provider billsCritical care is the exception. For 99291 and 99292, the substantive portion is time only. Path B is off the table. The MDM route never applies to critical care split/shared visits.
The two rulebooks on one line each
Print this and tape it to the coder's monitor. The first question is never "who did more work." It is "where did the visit happen."
| Dimension | Split / Shared | Incident-To |
|---|---|---|
| Setting | Facility (hospital, on/off-campus outpatient, ED, SNF) | Office and other non-facility (POS 11) |
| Regulation | 42 CFR 415.140 | 42 CFR 410.26 |
| Who bills | Provider who did the substantive portion | Supervising physician, under conditions |
| Deciding factor | Time over 50% OR substantive MDM | Plan of care + supervision + involvement |
| New patient / new problem | Allowed; whoever meets the substantive portion bills | Not permitted; physician must have initiated care |
| Supervision | Both providers in the same group, same day | Direct supervision: physician in the office suite, immediately available |
| Modifier | FS on the claim line | None; physician is rendering provider |
| Payment when correct | Full rate under physician, 85% under APP | Full physician rate |
Same patient, same day, three doors, three answers
A regional multispecialty group sees a patient with heart failure and new foot pain. Watch how the billing credit moves as the patient walks between settings and specialties. Archetypes only, no real patients.
Cardiology, hospital floor
The APP rounds first, the cardiologist sees the patient later and owns the medication decisions. Facility setting, so split/shared applies.
Cardiology, office follow-up
Two weeks later, established plan, the NP handles the stable recheck with the cardiologist supervising on site. POS 11.
Podiatry, office, new problem
Same visit, the patient raises brand new foot pain the physician never evaluated. New problem breaks incident-to instantly.
Critical care, ICU transfer
The patient decompensates. Physician and APP split critical care time in the facility. Only the clock counts here.
The five mistakes we see across multispecialty books
Filing incident-to from a facility place of service. Incident-to lives in the office only. A hospital or outpatient POS on an incident-to claim is a rule collision that does not survive review.
Billing a new patient or new problem incident-to. The physician must have personally initiated care and set the plan. A first visit, or a fresh diagnosis, cannot ride under the physician.
No physician in the suite. Direct supervision means the physician is present in the office and immediately available. "On call from home" does not satisfy it for standard incident-to services.
Choosing the time path when MDM tells the truth. In a split/shared visit you may pick either path, but the record has to support the one you billed. Document the substantive portion, do not assume it.
Using the MDM route for critical care. 99291 and 99292 are time only. Any MDM-based split of critical care between a physician and an APP is built on the wrong rule.
The 2026 authorities this page rests on
Retains the split/shared substantive-portion definition: more than half the total time, or a substantive part of the medical decision making, with critical care measured by time only.
The split/shared visit regulation. Defines the facility E/M shared between a physician and an NPP in the same group and the substantive-portion billing standard.
Services and supplies incident to a physician's professional service. Sets the direct-supervision, plan-of-care, and non-facility conditions for incident-to billing.
The "split or shared evaluation and management visit" modifier. Required on split/shared claim lines to identify the shared encounter to the payer.
Facility versus non-facility POS drives which rulebook applies. POS 11 signals office incident-to; facility codes signal split/shared.
Operational detail on incident-to supervision, the APP 85% payment differential, and split/shared documentation expectations.
Multispecialty billing is where these rules quietly break
When one group runs cardiology, podiatry, primary care and a dozen APPs across hospitals and offices, the split/shared and incident-to logic has to be encoded, not remembered. ASP-RCM Solutions builds the place-of-service and provider-attribution edits into your multispecialty-group billing workflow, so every shared visit routes to the correct rulebook, carries the right modifier, and lands under the right NPI at the right rate. We catch the 85% leaks before they post, not on the audit.
Bring us one month of shared-visit claims and we will show you exactly where the credit is going to the wrong provider.
Talk to our multispecialty billing team →This article summarizes federal billing rules for operational planning and is not legal, coding, or reimbursement advice. Verify current requirements against the CMS CY2026 Physician Fee Schedule final rule, 42 CFR 415.140, 42 CFR 410.26, and your Medicare Administrative Contractor and payer policies before adjusting billing practices. Scenarios use archetypes, not real patients or clients.
Related reading
92014 or 99214? The eye-exam code choice that pays differently every time.
Eye codes 92002-92014 or E/M 99202-99215 in 2026? Use our optometry and ophthalmology coding calculator to pic
Read →InsightThree dates that define the new landscape
Florida moved under-21 behavior analysis into nine MMA plans on Feb 1, 2025, then bound them to Rule 59G-4.125
Read →Field noteThe post-op encounter is billable. The modifier is what proves it.
A visual decision path that routes every orthopedic post-op encounter to the right global-period modifier (24,
Read →