Home / Case studies / Behavioral health

Case study · Case study: first 60 days

What our first 60 days found at a behavioral health and SUD organization: $1.04M of AR waiting on credentialing

A multi-site nonprofit whose largest service lines are behavioral health and substance use disorder treatment brought us in for its full revenue cycle in 2026. Before we promised any results, we rebuilt the baseline from raw transaction data. These are the measured findings, not projections.

October 3, 20264 min readASP-RCM Solutions

$1.04MInsurance AR sitting in a single return-for-credentialing work queue, about one dollar in five of insurance AR ASP-RCM engagement records
52.9%Share of insurance AR older than 90 days at transition, against a negotiated glidepath ceiling of 30% ASP-RCM engagement records
$2.24MDenial inventory at diligence, across 22,851 line items ASP-RCM engagement records

The organization

The client is a multi-site nonprofit health and human services organization in the Mid-Atlantic. Behavioral health and substance use disorder treatment are its largest service lines, and its payer mix is dominated by Medicaid managed care. The diligence data showed payments from 368 distinct payers. In the 13-month charge ledger, Medicaid accounted for 49% of charges, self-pay 21%, commercial 16% and Medicare 12%.

That mix creates a specific risk. Behavioral health and SUD programs employ many clinicians in different licensed and pre-licensed disciplines, each needing separate enrollment with each plan. Federal Medicaid rules require the state to screen and enroll every managed care network provider, so a clinician missing from either the state file or the plan roster can stop claims across a whole program.

What the diligence snapshot showed

Our first pass used the point-in-time AR and denial snapshot dated March 27, 2026. Insurance AR was $4,558,559, with 57.2% older than 90 days and 49.9% older than 120. Commercial AR was the most aged by share; managed Medicaid was the largest by dollars.

The denial inventory totaled $2,242,856 across 22,851 line items. The four largest root causes were coverage or non-covered service, missing information, credentialing, and timely filing. Credentialing and timely filing together came to about $570,000. Those two are the most preventable categories, because both are failures of process rather than payer policy.

Top denial root causes by dollars, diligence snapshot ASP-RCM engagement records
Coverage / non-covered$487KMissing information$478KCredentialing$307KTimely filing$262K
Insurance AR by payer group, diligence snapshot (March 27, 2026) ASP-RCM engagement records
Payer groupAR balanceShare over 90 days
Managed Medicaid$2.08M43%
Commercial$1.60M73%
Medicare$682K64%
Medicaid fee-for-service$213KNot broken out

What the transition extracts showed

After signing, we rebuilt every figure from three clean transaction extracts covering the six months from December 2025 through May 2026, and reconciled them to the cent with the client's finance team. Charges for the six months were $10.31M and net cash was $4.98M. Insurance AR at transition was $5.14M, with 52.9% older than 90 days, 42.4% older than 120 and 8.2% older than 365. Days in AR were 79 including self-pay and 103 excluding it. Open-denial AR was $1.46M.

The March and June figures come from different extracts, so we do not present the change between them as a trend. Both point the same way: more than half of insurance AR was past 90 days.

The single largest concentration in the whole book was one work queue: claims returned for credentialing, holding $1,036,334, or about 20% of insurance AR. These claims were held because a rendering clinician was not enrolled or not linked correctly with the payer, not because of a coding or medical necessity edit.

Insurance AR aging at transition (June 2026 extract) ASP-RCM engagement records
52.9 % of insurance AROver 90 days42.4 % of insurance AROver 120 days8.2 % of insurance AROver 365 days

What we put in front of leadership

We kept the read-out to what the data could prove. Where a metric could not be computed from the files we had, such as net collection rate and first-pass rate, which need 835 allowed amounts and a clearinghouse first-pass feed, we marked it as data pending rather than estimating it.

The plan treated the credentialing queue as a revenue problem, not an HR task. It paired retro-enrollment work on the held claims with front-end controls so new clinicians are enrolled and linked before they see patients. Aged AR was split into separate work streams so the oldest balances would not crowd out claims still inside filing limits.

  • Credentialing denials at or below 2% of denials
  • SUD first-pass rate of at least 97% on a glidepath
  • Authorization denials at or below 5% of mental health denials
  • Behavioral health AR over 120 days at or below 25% on a glidepath
  • Gross insurance AR over 90 days at or below 30% on a glidepath
  • Claims submitted within 5 business days and denials worked within 5 days
  1. Mar 2026Diligence snapshot of AR and denials
  2. May 2026Full revenue cycle engagement begins, with a 90-day stabilization phase
  3. Jun 2026Baseline rebuilt from clean transaction extracts and reconciled with the client
  4. NextMeasured results published after stabilization closes and figures are reconciled

What this means for other behavioral health organizations

If your organization employs counselors, therapists, social workers and SUD clinicians across several sites, look at your own work queues before your denial report. Credentialing holds often never become formal denials. They sit as returned or pended claims, aging quietly, until timely filing turns them into write-offs. In this engagement, credentialing and timely filing denials together were about $570,000 at diligence, and the credentialing queue was larger than any payer's denial balance.

We will publish measured results for this engagement once the stabilization period closes and the numbers are reconciled with the client. Until then, these are the baseline facts.

Frequently asked questions

Why does credentialing hit behavioral health and SUD programs harder than medical practices?

Behavioral health programs employ many clinicians across licensed disciplines, often at several sites, and Medicaid managed care requires each one to be enrolled with the state and credentialed with each plan. Turnover and new hires keep the roster moving. Any gap between who delivered the service and who is enrolled stops the claim, and those claims often sit in a returned queue instead of showing up as denials.

Are these results or projections?

Neither. They are measured baseline findings from the client's own transaction data: a March 2026 diligence snapshot and a six-month transition extract rebuilt and reconciled in June 2026. We have not published outcome figures because the stabilization period was still running. Where a metric could not be computed from the available files, we left it as data pending rather than estimating it.

What is the first thing to check in our own data?

Sort your open insurance AR by work queue or hold reason, not only by denial code. Total the balances held for credentialing, enrollment or provider-not-on-file reasons, then age them against each payer's timely filing limit. That shows how much is recoverable now and how much is close to becoming a write-off.

Sources

  1. eCFR: 42 CFR 438.602, State responsibilities (screening and enrollment of network providers)

Checked October 3, 2026. Rules change; confirm against the source before relying on them.

Find your credentialing holds

We can total your credentialing and enrollment holds by payer and age them against filing limits from your own data,.