Home / Case studies / Mental health
Case study · Behavioral health FQHC · Achieved, month four

A behavioral health-heavy health center: denial AR down 54% in four months, and the SLAs still breaching

Short answer: a multi-site health center whose book is dominated by behavioral health and substance use services, paid mostly by Medicaid managed care, handed us its full revenue cycle in June 2026. Four months later the denial inventory had halved. Three contract measures had not caught up, and this page reports both.
Go-live Jun 9, 2026 Medicaid managed care · encounter rate $1.42M to $656K · denial AR

October 27, 20265 min readASP-RCM Solutions

Archetype
BH-heavy FQHC
Go-live
Jun 9, 2026
Metric
Denial AR -54%
SLAs
3 breaching
Clean claim rate
95.51%
Status
Achieved, month 4
-54%
AR behind open denials, $1.42M at go-live to $656K on September 30
95.51%
October clean claim rate against a 95% SLA; no pre-handover baseline
41.4days
Denial turnaround against a 5-day SLA
59%
Cash posted within 7 days in July, from 16% at takeover
The organization and where this page starts

Month four, starting from the denial inventory

A multi-site nonprofit health center with medical, dental and behavioral health lines; behavioral health and substance use carry much of the volume, paid by Medicaid managed care at a fixed encounter rate. We took over coding, billing, posting, follow-up and credentialing support on June 9, 2026. The first 70 days are published; this page picks up at month four.

  1. 1
    Jun 9Go-live; AR behind open denials $1.42M
  2. 2
    JulPre-bill coding review live; posting within 7 days reaches 59%
  3. 3
    Aug 11Contract SLA scan: three behavioral measures breaching
  4. 4
    Sep 30Denial AR $656K, down 54%
  5. 5
    OctClean claim rate 95.51%; denial turnaround still 41 days
What moved

Lower at every month end, $1,424,386 to $655,508

AR behind an open denial, month-end snapshots

Same dated transaction extracts each month, like for like. Largest remaining reason: a procedure-to-provider-type edit on one payer, an enrollment correction.

$1.42Mgo-live, 100%
Jun 9takeover
$1.33M-6%
Jun 30month end
$1.20M-16%
Jul 30month end
$0.83M-42%
Aug 31month end
$0.66M-54%
Sep 30month end four
Go-liveMonth endsMonth end four

Share of cash posted within 7 days of receipt

Median lag 15 days at takeover

16%
Takeovermedian lag 15 d
31%
June+15 pts
59%
July+43 pts
3.7x in two months

Share of open AR over 90 days

Eased by mid-October; new cash clears young claims first

52.8%
Takeover
49.58%
Oct 12-3.2 pts
Improving, not solved
Takeaway

A denial inventory can only fall as fast as remittances are posted. Posting timeliness went first; the denial curve followed.

What did not move

Twelve service levels, computed from the client's own extracts

On August 11 we computed every SLA the data could support, from the client's extracts rather than our own reports, and three behavioral measures were breaching. By October the clean claim rate was above its SLA, but denial turnaround was still eight times its target. An operator deciding whether to outsource behavioral health billing needs both halves.

MeasureActualTargetStatus
Behavioral AR over 120 days (Aug 11)40.5%25% or lessBreach
Authorization share of behavioral denials (Aug 11)6.7%5% or lessBreach
Credentialing denials, share of denials (Aug 11)9.2%2% or lessBreach
Denial turnaround (Oct)41.36 days5 daysBreach
Clean claim rate (Oct)95.51%95% or moreMet
Open AR over 90 days (Oct 12)49.58%, was 52.8%TrackedImproving

Distance from target on the breaching measures

Bar is the actual as a multiple of its target; the target line is 1.0x.

Behavioral AR over 120 days40.5% vs 25%
1.6x target15.5 pts over
Authorization share of BH denials6.7% vs 5%
1.3x target1.7 pts over; an intake control
Credentialing denials share9.2% vs 2%
4.6x target7.2 pts over
Denial turnaround41.36 days vs 5 days
8.3x targetfurthest from contract
01.0x target4x8.3x
Breaching, as a multiple of target
Why behavioral health lags the rest of the book

Where the behavioral denial dollars come from

Enrollment

$276,644 adjusted in four months

  • Services billed under practitioners not yet enrolled with the payer
  • Highest practitioner turnover in the center, so enrollment is always catching up
  • The largest remaining denial reason is one provider-type edit on one payer

The encounter code

57% of 2026 denial dollars

  • $1.11M of $1.95M sat on the code that carries the whole visit payment
  • A denial there loses the whole visit, which is why pre-bill review beats rework

Authorization

6.7% against a 5% ceiling

  • Authorization-related share of behavioral denials
  • An intake control, not a billing one
What we did

The operating changes behind the curve

1

Denials counted from extracts

AR behind an open denial is re-derived every month from dated transaction extracts, never from a worklist count, so the trend cannot be flattered.

2

Posting before follow-up

Remittance posting moved to a daily cadence first, because an unposted denial cannot be worked.

3

Reason to owner

Every denial class routes to the team that owns the cause: enrollment, intake authorization, coding or payer dispute.

4

Pre-bill review

A 100% pre-bill coding review queue for encounter claims, so whole-visit denials are prevented rather than appealed.

5

SLA scorecard from the data

Contract SLAs computed from the client's extracts and shown to the board with breaches marked, not summarized away.

What is still open

Reported as measured, including the misses

  • 8.3x
    Denial turnaround is 41.36 days against a 5-day SLAThe curve is falling, but the speed at which an individual denial is first touched is the measure furthest from contract.
  • 120+
    Behavioral AR over 120 days was 40.5% against a 25% ceiling on August 11New cash clears young claims fastest; the aged behavioral tail needs its own write-off and dispute decisions.
  • CCR
    No clean claim rate measured before the handoverOctober's 95.51% is compared with the client's own September figure of 93.32%; a pre-handover baseline has been requested so the board sees one measure on both sides.
  • 835
    Net collection rate and first-pass resolution pendingAwaiting the clearinghouse acceptance feed; not reported here. Timely-payment rules still apply to the payers [1] [2].
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does 'AR behind open denials' measure?

The open insurance balance on accounts that carry an unresolved denial, taken from dated transaction extracts at each month end. It fell from $1,424,386 at go-live to $655,508 on September 30, 2026, a 54% reduction, and was lower at every month end than the one before.

Why report SLAs that are still breaching?

Because an operator comparing behavioral health billing services needs the misses with the wins. On August 11, behavioral AR over 120 days was 40.5% against a 25% ceiling, authorization-related denials were 6.7% of behavioral denials against 5%, and credentialing denials were 9.2% against 2%. Denial turnaround in October was 41.36 days against a 5-day SLA.

Why does posting timeliness matter to denials?

A denial that has not been posted is invisible to the follow-up team. Cash posted within seven days of receipt went from 16% at takeover to 59% in July, and the denial inventory fell in every month after.

Is 95.51% a clean claim improvement?

It is above the 95% contract SLA, but no clean claim rate was measured before the handover. The nearest comparison is the client's own September figure of 93.32%, so we present October as meeting the SLA rather than as a measured improvement.

Sources
  1. 42 CFR 447.45, Timely claims payment: definition of a clean claim and the 30-day and 90-day payment standards (eCFR)
  2. 42 CFR 447.46, Timely claims payment by MCOs (eCFR)

Checked October 27, 2026. Engagement figures are from ASP-RCM records and the client's own exports; the client is described by type only.

Related

See your denial inventory the same way

We re-derive AR behind open denials from your own extracts, map each denial class to its owner and show which contract measures would breach today.